Comprehending Earn Outs: Should Founders Concur?

This blog is in the Top 25 M&A blogs worldwide according to Feedspot

As founders engage in the acquisition process, they may confront the pivotal decision of consenting to an earn out as an integral component of the acquisition agreement. The following presents an in-depth examination of the rationale behind whether it is prudent for founders to acquiesce to earn outs.

What Are Earn Outs?

An earn out constitutes a contractual stipulation that correlates a segment of the acquisition's compensation to the subsequent performance of the acquired entity. This arrangement can serve the interests of both the acquirer, by diminishing the risk of excessive payment, and the seller, by potentially obtaining a superior payout contingent upon favorable company performance.

https://ltse.com/insights/what-is-an-earnout#:~:text=This%20can%20benefit%20both%20parties,challenging%20to%20negotiate%20and%20administer

Advantages of Earn Outs

1. Risk Mitigation: Earn outs possess the capacity to align the incentives of buyers and sellers by modifying payments predicated on post-acquisition performance, thereby lessening the likelihood of overpayment for the acquirer.

https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XAKK2U6C000000/m-a-professional-perspective-pros-cons-of-earn-outs-rollovers-in

2. Potential for Enhanced Valuation: Founders may realize a heightened final price should their company fulfill specified milestones and performance objectives, effectively correlating payout to tangible results. https://blog.acquire.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-earnouts-in-an-acquisition/

3. Bridging Valuation Discrepancies: Earn outs function as mechanisms to reconcile disparities in valuation expectations between the buyer and seller, thereby facilitating more seamless transactions.

https://ledgy.com/blog/earnouts-guide

Disadvantages of Earn Outs

1. Complex Negotiations: The formulation and administration of earn out agreements can be intricate and contentious, frequently necessitating comprehensive agreements on metrics and targets that may incite disputes.

https://ltse.com/insights/what-is-an-earnout#:~:text=This%20can%20benefit%20both%20parties,challenging%20to%20negotiate%20and%20administer

2. Reliance on Management: Success is predominantly contingent upon the future management team, which the founder may not influence post-acquisition, potentially resulting in misalignment of objectives.

https://www.anchin.com/articles/earnouts-in-ma-transactions-a-valuable-solution-in-an-exit-strategy/

3. Prospects for Disputes: The vagueness surrounding performance metrics and targets can precipitate disagreements, rendering earn outs a plausible source of legal contention among the involved parties.

Conclusion

The determination of whether founders should acquiesce to earn outs is largely contingent upon the particular circumstances surrounding the acquisition, encompassing their confidence in the future performance of the company and the rapport with the acquirer. Unambiguous definitions of performance metrics, in conjunction with a robust post-acquisition strategy, can assist in mitigating risks and aligning incentives.

Prudent consideration and legal counsel are paramount in ensuring that earn out agreements are constructed in a manner that is equitable and manageable for all parties concerned.

Thinking about selling your software business? Contact me at +4962025829917 or email

Next
Next

5 key topics for successful merger integration